Where does an object dropped in space go?
An astronaut throws a bag or a CubeSat from the station: straight line, Clohessy-Wiltshire, Kepler, or a calculation with air and a flattened Earth — four ways to predict its path, which drift apart orbit after orbit.
Variables
- The direction of the throw: forward, backward, up (zenith), down (nadir), sideways, or free (azimuth and elevation)
- The speed of the throw, from 0.05 to 5 m/s
- The object: tool bag, 1U or 3U CubeSat, or any mass and area (ballistic coefficient)
- Solar activity (low, moderate, high), which sets the air density at the station’s altitude
- The station’s altitude (340 to 460 km) and the time span (1 orbit to 7 days)
- The calculation methods compared, and the view: the station’s frame or the Earth’s frame
Key figures
- 92.9 min
- one orbit of the station at 420 km, at 7.66 km/s
- 6π·Δv/n
- drift per orbit of an object thrown forward: 8.4 km for 0.5 m/s
- 1 orbit
- for an object thrown upward to return to its starting point
- 45°
- backward and down: the ejection direction of J-SSOD CubeSats (0.77 to 1.7 m/s)
- ×17
- air density at 420 km between a quiet and an active Sun (NRLMSIS 2.0)
- 8 months
- in orbit for the tool bag lost in November 2008, which re-entered on 3 August 2009
What happens, step by step.
- 01
In orbit, nothing really floats
Inside the station, everything seems weightless. In fact, gravity at 420 km is still 88% of its value at the ground: the station and everything in it fall around the Earth at 7.66 km/s, one orbit every 93 minutes. A released object falls exactly like the station, which is why it seems to hang still. But the slightest push puts it on a slightly different orbit, and that difference draws its path as seen from the station.
- 02
Method 1: the straight line
Without gravity, an object pushed at Δv would go straight on, covering Δv × t. That holds for a minute or two: beyond that, the error grows as the square of time, and after a quarter of an orbit the straight line is completely wrong. Thrown forward, the object even ends up behind.
- 03
Method 2: Clohessy-Wiltshire (Hill)
In 1878, George Hill wrote down the motion of the Moon as seen from a frame rotating with the Earth; in 1960, Clohessy and Wiltshire adapted these equations to the rendezvous of two satellites. We work in the station’s frame (V-bar forward, R-bar towards the zenith, H-bar to the side) and assume the gap is small compared with the radius of the orbit. The equations become linear and can be solved by hand: thrown forward at Δv, the object climbs to 4Δv/n and then falls back 6π·Δv/n per orbit (n: angular rate of the orbit); thrown upward, it traces an ellipse twice as long as it is tall and returns to its starting point after one orbit; thrown sideways, it oscillates and crosses the station’s orbit every half orbit. It is the basic tool for rendezvous, approaches and deployments.
- 04
Method 3: the two-body problem
The station and the object are each computed on their exact Keplerian orbit around a round Earth, by numerical integration (Dormand-Prince Runge-Kutta, order 5, adaptive step), then their difference is expressed in the station’s frame. For small throws and short times, it matches Clohessy-Wiltshire to within a few centimetres. When the object drifts hundreds of kilometres away, CW, written along straight axes, no longer follows the curvature of the orbit: the error is first of all geometric.
- 05
Method 4: a flattened Earth, and air
The Earth bulges at the equator (the J2 term): the plane of the orbits turns by about 5° a day at a 51.6° inclination. Since the station and the object turn almost together, this barely changes the gap between them. Air changes everything: at 400 km, its density is still around 10⁻¹² kg/m³, enough to brake. What matters is the ballistic coefficient, mass divided by Cd × area: a bag or a CubeSat (40 to 55 kg/m²) is braked proportionally more than the station (≈ 150 kg/m²), sinks faster and, on a lower orbit, moves faster and gets ahead.
- 06
Why the prediction stays uncertain
Air density depends on the Sun: at 420 km, it is 10 to 20 times higher when the Sun is active, and it can double within hours during a geomagnetic storm. The area an object presents to the air changes as it tumbles. And the station itself manoeuvres. The close-approach calculations used by operators therefore start from fresh tracking data and are redone regularly, with an explicit error margin.
What the scene simplifies
- The station starts on a circular orbit (51.64° inclination); the real one is very slightly elliptical and raised by regular manoeuvres, which are not simulated.
- The paths start from the airlock, but the calculation starts from the station’s centre of mass: a few metres that do not change the shape of the paths.
- Clohessy-Wiltshire and the two-body problem are shown in the station’s Cartesian frame (V-bar, R-bar, H-bar). Hundreds of kilometres away, part of the gap between them comes from the curvature of the orbit, not from different physics.
- Gravity: a spherical Earth plus the J2 term only (no Moon, no Sun, no higher harmonics).
- Air: mean NRLMSIS 2.0 density (averaged over latitude, longitude and local time, at equinox) for three fixed levels of solar activity; the air turns with the Earth. Day/night and seasonal variations and geomagnetic storms are not simulated.
- Drag: Cd = 2.2, mean area of a tumbling object (total surface ÷ 4). The station’s area, which depends on the attitude of its solar arrays, is reduced to a mean value (≈ 150 kg/m², about 100 m of altitude lost per day at moderate solar activity).
- In the Earth view, the gap between the station and the object is enlarged to be visible (the factor is shown; it is 1 when the gap exceeds 900 km). In the station view, the station is enlarged when you move away, so that it stays visible.
- Solar radiation pressure, the tumbling of the object and the station’s attitude motion are not taken into account. The object is considered to have re-entered at 120 km.
- The 2008 bag: its real push is not known; the case uses 0.1 m/s backward, as an assumption.
Further reading
- Clohessy & Wiltshire, Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous, J. Aerospace Sci. 27 (9), 653-658 (1960)
The equations of relative motion about a circular orbit.
- Hill, Researches in the Lunar Theory, American Journal of Mathematics 1 (1), 5-26 (1878)
The same equations, written for the Moon in a rotating frame.
- Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, 4e éd., Butterworth-Heinemann (2020)
Chapter 7: relative motion, LVLH frame, Clohessy-Wiltshire solution; J2 and drag perturbations.
- Vallado, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 5e éd., Microcosm Press (2022)
Hill’s equations, perturbations (J2, atmospheric drag), constants.
- Dormand & Prince, A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 6 (1), 19-26 (1980)
The numerical integration scheme used for methods 3 and 4.
- Emmert et al., NRLMSIS 2.0, Earth and Space Science 8 (3), e2020EA001321 (2021)
The model of upper-atmosphere density (computed here for F10.7 = 70, 150 and 220).
- NASA, Space Station Facts and Figures
Mass (419,725 kg), dimensions, 16 orbits a day.
- JAXA, J-SSOD (JEM Small Satellite Orbital Deployer)
Ejection at 45° towards aft and nadir, at 0.77–1.7 m/s for CubeSats.
- Nanoracks, CubeSat Deployer Interface Definition Document (NR-NRCSD-S0003)
Deployer pointed towards the back of the station; ejection speed from 0.5 to 2 m/s.
- NBC News / Space.com, Skywatchers spot « lost » space tool kit (novembre 2008)
The STS-126 bag: about 14 kg, 51 × 30 cm, magnitude 6.4, visible with binoculars ahead of the station.
- Scientific American, Tool kit dropped from space station is orbital junk no more (3 août 2009)
Re-entry of the bag on 3 August 2009, after more than eight months in orbit.